We have rocks from the Moon (brought back), meteorites, and rocks that we know came from Mars.We can then use radioactive age dating in order to date the ages of the surfaces (when the rocks first formed, i.e. We also have meteorites from asteroids and can date them, too.Dinosaurs are not dated with Carbon-14, yet some researchers have claimed that there is still Carbon-14 in the bones. Do these data indicate that a more accurate method needs to be derived?What solutions are available for increasing accuracy of the tests? From the source linked above: Carbon-14 is considered to be a highly reliable dating technique.Far from being data, these dates are actually interpretations of the data.As discussed before, the assumptions influence the interpretation of the data.Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming?For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water.
And the result of this accepted method dates dinosaur fossils to around 68 million years old. Its half-life ($t_$) is only 5,730 years—that is, every 5,730 years, half of it decays away.He said that his team and the laboratories they employed took special care to avoid contamination.That included protecting the samples, avoiding cracked areas in the bones, and meticulous pre-cleaning of the samples with chemicals to remove possible contaminants.Radiometric dating can be compared to an hourglass.When the timepiece is turned over, sand grains fall from the top of the hourglass to the bottom.