Maria Grazia Siliato, one of the worlds foremost experts on the Shroud, had to tell us.
There are many things which will astound you, and much evidence which you have never heard mentioned which may make you want to think again.
To non-believers, this sounds like an ad hoc hypothesis. The suggestions that modern biological contaminants were sufficient to modernize the date are also ridiculous.
A weight of 20th century carbon equaling nearly two times the weight of the Shroud carbon itself would be required to change a 1st century date to the 14th century (see It may interest skeptics to know that many people of faith believe that there is scientific evidence which supports their belief in the shroud's authenticity.
Are you convinced that the image is only a forgery? Do you think that the carbon-dating tests conducted in 1988 proved conclusively that the Shroud was an elaborate forgery dating from the 14th century?
Then sit comfortably in your armchair, take a deep breath, and read carefully what Dr.
Siliato with the most common objections against the authenticity of the Shroud. The first photo was taken exactly a hundred years ago, in 1898, by the lawyer, Secondo Pia.
After its miraculous escape from a fire in Turin Cathedral last April, the Shroud, venerated as a relic of Jesus, has started to reveal its mysteries and they dont fail to astonish.After thousands of hours of scientific analysis, the Shroud remains a profound mystery.has presented to hundreds of audiences over the past 25 years.is a dramatic big screen experience and in-depth exploration into the mysteries of the Shroud of Turin.Using a CSI approach, audiences are taken on a thought provoking adventure through early church history, ancient art, modern science, and medical forensics.